kralbetz.combetturkeygiris.orgbahis.comhipas.infowiibet.comrestbetcdn.comtop-casino.bizebetebet.commariogame.netSiber güvenlik haberleri

NLS Enlaw

  • Facebook
  • ENLAW
    • Pollution Control Laws
      • Air Pollution Control Laws
      • Environment Management System
      • Water/River Laws
      • Waste Management Law
    • Natural Resources Conservation Laws
      • Energy
      • Mining
      • Land Laws
      • CRZ
    • Biodiversity & Animal Welfare
      • Animal Law and Ethics
      • Biodiversity Legal Framework
      • Forest Law
      • Wildlife
    • Law On People Profit & Planet
      • Climate Change
      • Environment and Trade
      • Food and Agriculture
      • Nanotechnology and Environment
      • Urban Poor and the Law
  • GREEN TEAM
  • PUBLICATIONS
  • OUR SERVICES
    • Consultancy
  • PROJECTS
    • Urban Project
    • Chemical Waste Project
    • Law & Justice Project
    • AGRI-CRP Project
    • Completed Projects
  • TRAINING
    • Upcoming Programmes
    • Completed Programmes
  • COURSES
    • Post Graduate Diploma in Environmental Law (PGDEL)
    • Certificate Course
      • Completed
      • Ongoing
  • JOIN US
    • Internships
    • Institutional Partnerships
  • CONTACT US
  • BLOG
  • Home
  • Wildlife
  • National Legal Framework
  • High Court Cases
  • Defence of Environment and Animals vs. Principle Chief Conservator of Forest MANU/TN/2317/2011
 

Defence of Environment and Animals vs. Principle Chief Conservator of Forest  MANU/TN/2317/2011

Petitioners had challenged legality or otherwise of decision of Government of Tamil Nadu to identify and notify ‘Elephant Corridor’ at Nilgiris, and its consequential actions. Hence, this Writ Petition was filed. The court held, State Government was fully empowered to notify elephant corridor as management strategy and was also authorized by Project Elephant of Central Government since there was no impediment in 1972 Act, in declaring elephant corridor by State Government. Therefore, action initiated by State Government to identify elephant corridor could not be found fault with since it had only acted towards implementing its obligation created under Article 5l-A (g) of Constitution. The challenge made to formation of Committee and report filed by said Committee could not be found fault with as though formation of Committee by Court was nothing but intruding into powers of State and National Boards formed under 1972 Act. The notification of elephant corridor did not intervene or violate functions and duties of Boards and in fact, by this act, State Government had fulfilled its obligations created under Article 51-A (g) of Constitution, in which Court was unable to find any illegality. Under scheme of G.O., in question State Government had better protected interests of tribal and traditional dwellers. And the court held that the State is Guardian of interests of not only human beings but also wildlife. Government had consciously applied its mind to interests of various parties and had come out with more practicable and workable solutions.  On complete analysis of entire materials placed on record and upon hearing parties at length, Court was unable to find any illegality or irregularity in action of State Government in notifying elephant corridor. Hence, resort owners and other private land owners were directed to vacate and hand over vacant possession of lands falling within notified ‘elephant corridor’ to District Collector Writ Petitions were disposed of and all other Writ Petitions dismissed. Ratio Decidendi “State Government shall fully empower to notify elephant corridor as management strategy and is also authorized by Project Elephant of Central Government since there is no impediment in declaring elephant corridor by State Government.”

1 Comment to “ Defence of Environment and Animals vs. Principle Chief Conservator of Forest MANU/TN/2317/2011”

  1. jendela aluminium says :
    February 23, 2022 at 5:36 pm

    jendela aluminium

    NIPPO 自動紙折り機 ( NP110 ) A4サイズ対応 標準4種の折り+α 電動シュレッダー – nlaw.nls.ac.in

  • Pollution Control Laws
    • Air Pollution Control Laws
    • Environment Management System
    • Water/River Laws
    • Waste Management Law
  • Natural Resources Conservation Laws
    • Energy
    • Mining
    • Land Laws
    • CRZ
  • Biodiversity & Animal Welfare
    • Animal Law and Ethics
    • Biodiversity Legal Framework
    • Forest Law
    • Wildlife
  • Law On People Profit & Planet
    • Climate Change
    • Environment and Trade
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Nanotechnology and Environment
    • Urban Poor and the Law

About Ceera

The Centre for Environmental Law Education, Research and Advocacy (CEERA), established in 1997 is a research centre that focuses on research and policy advocacy in the field of environmental law. Building an environmental law database, effectively networking among all stakeholders, undertaking training and capacity development exercises, providing consultancy services and building an environmental law community are CEERA’s main objectives. It enjoys the support of the Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change, other Ministries, international organizations, the Bar and the Bench in India.

Our Services

Due Diligence
General Commercial Transactions
Board Room Strategy & Corporate Governance
Corporate Representation & Dispute Resolution
Intellectual Property Protection & Management
Private Equity Investment & Venture Capital Funding
Company Secretarial Compliances
Pro-Bono Public Spirited Actions

Contact Us

Centre for Environmental Law Education, Research and Advocacy [CEERA]
National Law School of India University
Gnana Bharathi Main Rd, Opp NAAC, Teachers Colony,
Nagarabhaavi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560072

Phone No: +91 80 23160527

Email: commonscell@nls.ac.in/ ceera@nls.ac.in
Working hours
Mon-Sat: 09:30 AM - 5:00 PM
Sun: Closed

Handcrafted with ♥ by whizkid © 2019 NLS Enlaw All rights reserved.

TOP
Previous Next
Close
Test Caption
Test Description goes like this